We and you in Paul

Home to philosophers, theologians, (and wanna-bes in either category).
Post Reply
User avatar
VeryTas
Pioneer
Pioneer
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2024 10:04 pm
Location: WA
Religion: Catholic
Contact:

We and you in Paul

Post by VeryTas »

Let me try to lay out a little problem with English translations of today's second reading. The NAB, for instance gave us:
Ephesians 1: 3 wrote: Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavens, 4 as he chose us in him, before the foundation of the world, to be holy and without blemish before him. 5 In love he destined us for adoption to himself through Jesus Christ ... . 12 ... so that we might exist for the praise of his glory, we who first hoped in Christ. 13 In him you also, who have heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation, and have believed in him, were sealed with the promised holy Spirit ... .
1. Now, I suppose that in Christ everyone is blessed with every spiritual blessing in the heavens, whatever those are.

2. I suppose that all we who were baptized exist now for the praise of God's glory.

3. I suppose that, through Jesus, God did destine us for adoption to himself.

4. I suppose that we who heard and believed the gospel were sealed with the Spirit.

However, I'm afraid Paul is not exactly saying all these things. Let's take them in reverse order:

4. Yes, he does say that we who believed were sealed with the Spirit, but notice how he doesn't say "we" anymore; he for the first time says "you". He wouldn't leave himself out, but it shows that up to this point the "we" might not include us, his readers. There are many instances in Paul's letters where he speaks of himself (and his fellow apostles) as "we", only to abruptly then address the recipients of the letter as a different entity: "you". (For this see, for instance, 2 Cor. 1:3-6; 2:13-17; 4:5, 12-14; 5:11, 13, 20; 6:1, 8b-11.)

3. In light of this and against all modern English translations, the older Douay-Rheims and KJV reveal that in verse 5, Paul is not making a point about Christians' being destined for adoption as children of God; rather it is about his own being destined for adopting children to the Father through Christ. "Who hath predestinated us unto the adoption of children through Jesus Christ unto himself" (D-R).

2. This also answers the question that should arise from verse 12: We who first hoped in Christ should exist for the praise of his glory, as opposed to those who hoped later on? Why this "first"? Yes, Paul hoped first, before the Ephesian church; and Paul was sent to them, praising the Father's glory.

1. So is it OK that Paul was blessed with every spiritual blessing in the heavens (he does recount that he was taken up there), without our necessarily being so thoroughly blessed (yet)? It was for our good, after all.
User avatar
zeno
Board Administrator
Board Administrator
Posts: 480
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2023 8:38 pm
Religion: Catholic

Re: We and you in Paul

Post by zeno »

I found the original formatting hard to follow so I changed it up a bit. I still am not sure I understand the question - but that might just be me. :-D
Thank you for your patience as I build the board. I have about 1/16 to go.

*All opinions expressed on this board are those of the person posting, including mine.*
User avatar
VeryTas
Pioneer
Pioneer
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2024 10:04 pm
Location: WA
Religion: Catholic
Contact:

Re: We and you in Paul

Post by VeryTas »

It is better formatted now, thanks to Zeno.
I don't have a question really. I only wanted to point out that the English translations we use mostly do not listen to Paul, what he is actually saying. So, for instance, we get used to being told that in Christ we ourselves have been blessed with every spiritual blessing in the heavens. "In Christ" this may be true in some abstract sense or some day, but we don't know this by experience, whereas Paul seems to have known it regarding himself.
One bad effect of hearing that I am so blessed, when I am not exactly, can be that I say, "Right, when did that happen? Another exaggeration brought to me by Scripture and the Church!"
Post Reply